Friday, October 17, 2003
The liberal Democrats running for President are clearly out of touch with the average American, who knows evil when he sees it. Some of these characters wanting to be President have bought into radical humanism so deeply that they see all men as moral equals: Saddam's sons as the same as Martin Luther. Click on the link to get the whole story.
FOXNews.com - FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll - FOX News Poll - Poll: Action in Iraq Was Right Thing to Do: "A majority of the public thinks going to war with Iraq was the right thing for the United States to do, but considerably fewer Americans believe a lot of progress has been made there. Nearly half disapprove of press coverage of operations in Iraq, and many Americans think news reports focus mainly on the negative things happening in Iraq."
FOXNews.com - FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll - FOX News Poll - Poll: Action in Iraq Was Right Thing to Do: "A majority of the public thinks going to war with Iraq was the right thing for the United States to do, but considerably fewer Americans believe a lot of progress has been made there. Nearly half disapprove of press coverage of operations in Iraq, and many Americans think news reports focus mainly on the negative things happening in Iraq."
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Good point, Mayor. On the Sean Hannity program today, former New York mayor Giulliani said that we did not go into Iraq because we knew he had WMD. We went in because we didn't know that he didn't have them, that he refused to cooperate with inspectors, and refused to reveal how those that we knew he had were disposed of. If he didn't have them, then his blood is on his own head. He played Russian Roulette and lost.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Liberals are all for civil rights as long as the black man, or woman, stays on the plantation. Get off the plantation, however, and they will send the bloodhounds after you. Click on the next link to read the shame.
Black Democrats denounce judicial nominee Brown as another 'Clarence Thomas': "The black Democrats said Brown's conservative credentials make her unfit for the D.C. judgeship. Brown, who is black, is considered among the California high court's most conservative justices. "
Black Democrats denounce judicial nominee Brown as another 'Clarence Thomas': "The black Democrats said Brown's conservative credentials make her unfit for the D.C. judgeship. Brown, who is black, is considered among the California high court's most conservative justices. "
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Bush's foreign policy "not good for the world": Madeleine Albright: "'It's difficult to be in France and criticise my government. But I'm doing so because Bush and the people working for him have a foreign policy that is not good for America, not good for the world,' she said."
I have a wonderful idea, Madam. Suppose you stay in France with the wimps and cowards. Seems as if you belong. Clinton was good for the world, maybe, but good for America? But then, liberals cannot tell the difference, can they? But then, just keep talking, and we will elect a bunch of Republicans next year.
I have a wonderful idea, Madam. Suppose you stay in France with the wimps and cowards. Seems as if you belong. Clinton was good for the world, maybe, but good for America? But then, liberals cannot tell the difference, can they? But then, just keep talking, and we will elect a bunch of Republicans next year.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Thursday, October 16, 2003
Clintons Sued in L.A. Over Campaign Donations: "Hollywood producer Peter Paul has sued former President Bill Clinton, and U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton, contending the former first couple got him in trouble with federal authorities by failing to report his $2 million in-kind contributions to her Senate campaign."
Yep. Rush Limbaugh is a real hypocrite.
Yep. Rush Limbaugh is a real hypocrite.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Reuters News Article: "At Wednesday's luncheon, Clinton said his inability to convince Bush of the danger from al Qaeda was 'one of the two or three of the biggest disappointments that I had.'"
I nevah work'd so hard in mah life. It ain't mah fawlt. I tried and tried. The other disappointments were a little girl down in.... but there Ah go agin."
And Limbaugh's a hypocrite?
I nevah work'd so hard in mah life. It ain't mah fawlt. I tried and tried. The other disappointments were a little girl down in.... but there Ah go agin."
And Limbaugh's a hypocrite?
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
A Great Victory for the United States and for President Bush
Yahoo! News - U.N. Unanimously Adopts Iraq Resolution: "The resolution authorizes a multinational military force in Iraq under a single command led by the United States, and calls for troop contributions and 'substantial' financial pledges from the 191 U.N. member states. "
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Has it become hypocrisy now to express your opinions about the President of the United States? Here? in America?
I do not claim to be the brightest star in the sky, but it seems to me that there is a great difference between a radio commentator and the President of the United States.
President Clinton was an employee of the people of the United States. Limbaugh works for the radio.
President Clinton spent his whole presidency doing damage control for one scandal after another. Should any citizen have a right to complain? Does he have to be an angel? Are Limbaugh's present critics angels?
President Clinton was chief law enforcement officer of the United States who perjured himself to avoid a civil award for damages from a woman to whom he made sexual advances [Paula Jones]. Limbaugh has not lied about his drug problem to our knowledge.
President Clinton authorized vicious attacks on all the the women who complained about his sexual harrassment and assaults. Through his wife he blamed his political opponents. He destroyed anyone who stood in his way. Limbaugh has not attacked the former maid who sold her story to The National Enquirer.
President Clinton had his finger on the nuclear button; hence, character matters. Who cares what kind of man Limbaugh is? It doesn't matter if a radio commentator thumbs his nose at the law; it matters a great deal if the President of the United States does. And even the most humble citizen, no matter what his character, has a right to speak his mind about the President of the United States.
Has it now come to this? that only those with the character of angels, or those who reject all moral standards are the only people who can take issue with the policies or behavior of the President of the United States.
Who is the hypocrites? Limbaugh? or the vicious, bone-gnawing coyotes who promote every moral deformity, legal manipulation, and every kind of shennigan in order to retain power?
But let the Liberals continue to be wrong and mistaken about the nature of their opposition. If they think that it rises from talk radio, they will continue to be wrong, and continue to lose elections.
Byron York on Rush Limbaugh on National Review Online: "Part of the reason some on the left are delighted by Limbaugh's troubles is that they're still angry over his relentless criticism of Bill Clinton. They believe Limbaugh's problems have revealed him for the hypocrite he's always been."
Hm. If you criticize your presdent, you are a hypocrite.
I do not claim to be the brightest star in the sky, but it seems to me that there is a great difference between a radio commentator and the President of the United States.
President Clinton was an employee of the people of the United States. Limbaugh works for the radio.
President Clinton spent his whole presidency doing damage control for one scandal after another. Should any citizen have a right to complain? Does he have to be an angel? Are Limbaugh's present critics angels?
President Clinton was chief law enforcement officer of the United States who perjured himself to avoid a civil award for damages from a woman to whom he made sexual advances [Paula Jones]. Limbaugh has not lied about his drug problem to our knowledge.
President Clinton authorized vicious attacks on all the the women who complained about his sexual harrassment and assaults. Through his wife he blamed his political opponents. He destroyed anyone who stood in his way. Limbaugh has not attacked the former maid who sold her story to The National Enquirer.
President Clinton had his finger on the nuclear button; hence, character matters. Who cares what kind of man Limbaugh is? It doesn't matter if a radio commentator thumbs his nose at the law; it matters a great deal if the President of the United States does. And even the most humble citizen, no matter what his character, has a right to speak his mind about the President of the United States.
Has it now come to this? that only those with the character of angels, or those who reject all moral standards are the only people who can take issue with the policies or behavior of the President of the United States.
Who is the hypocrites? Limbaugh? or the vicious, bone-gnawing coyotes who promote every moral deformity, legal manipulation, and every kind of shennigan in order to retain power?
But let the Liberals continue to be wrong and mistaken about the nature of their opposition. If they think that it rises from talk radio, they will continue to be wrong, and continue to lose elections.
Byron York on Rush Limbaugh on National Review Online: "Part of the reason some on the left are delighted by Limbaugh's troubles is that they're still angry over his relentless criticism of Bill Clinton. They believe Limbaugh's problems have revealed him for the hypocrite he's always been."
Hm. If you criticize your presdent, you are a hypocrite.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
WorldNetDaily: With half his brain tied behind his back: "The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites. "
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Wednesday, October 15, 2003
He that diggeth a pit shall fall into it; and whoso breaketh an hedge, a serpent shall bite him. Whoso removeth stones shall be hurt therewith; and he that cleaveth wood shall be endangered thereby.
Ecclesiastes 10:8,9
There are dangers in every occupation. Many a man has fallen into the hole he was digging, and many a man has been hurt chopping wood. If you a tearing down a hedge, you might be in danger of a serpent hiding in the hedge and you might drop a stone on your foot when you are clearing stones from a field.
Because work has hazzards, some do not go to work at all. "What, do you want me to hurt myself?"
Reminds me of the whining that is going on over our losses in Iraq. The losses, of course, are terrible--even they are miniscule compared to the casualties in our war with the Nazis--but we knew there would be losses. Our liberty and our faith are worth fighting for. The man who needs to take the hedge down knows there is risk involved, but the gain is greater than the risk; having wood to heat the house and cook the food is worth the risk involved in chopping it.
Dainty sissies who are afraid of getting their hands soiled are not worth a hill of beans. The baby that runs crying to Mama every time he scrapes his shins is despised by all those who have learned to be men.
Ecclesiastes 10:8,9
There are dangers in every occupation. Many a man has fallen into the hole he was digging, and many a man has been hurt chopping wood. If you a tearing down a hedge, you might be in danger of a serpent hiding in the hedge and you might drop a stone on your foot when you are clearing stones from a field.
Because work has hazzards, some do not go to work at all. "What, do you want me to hurt myself?"
Reminds me of the whining that is going on over our losses in Iraq. The losses, of course, are terrible--even they are miniscule compared to the casualties in our war with the Nazis--but we knew there would be losses. Our liberty and our faith are worth fighting for. The man who needs to take the hedge down knows there is risk involved, but the gain is greater than the risk; having wood to heat the house and cook the food is worth the risk involved in chopping it.
Dainty sissies who are afraid of getting their hands soiled are not worth a hill of beans. The baby that runs crying to Mama every time he scrapes his shins is despised by all those who have learned to be men.
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story: "Washed-up left-wing actor Ed Asner reportedly suggested over the weekend that a cabal of liberals is preparing to smear conservative media star Sean Hannity the way they smeared Rush Limbaugh with the publication of last week's National Enquirer painkiller expose."
Makes my heart warm to think of how caring and gentle these folks are. Yep. Caring like barrcudas
Makes my heart warm to think of how caring and gentle these folks are. Yep. Caring like barrcudas
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
Tuesday, October 14, 2003
Michael Ledeen on Iran on National Review Online The Kazemi affair was very embarrassing to the Islamic Republic, and the Nobel award to Ms. Ebadi was a slap in Khamenei's face. Just when the democratic opposition was floundering — the result of savage beatings, thousands of arrests and torture, and near-total abandonment by the feckless leaders of the West — the Norwegian committee sent a message of hope and inspiration: Do not despair, we are with you.
Wouldn't you know, that a few days after I criticized the Nobel committee they did something good. Read this article and rejoice!
Wouldn't you know, that a few days after I criticized the Nobel committee they did something good. Read this article and rejoice!
'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
